dda6d7ee8c
actual
539 lines
26 KiB
Plaintext
539 lines
26 KiB
Plaintext
Changes
|
|
=======
|
|
|
|
v2 has many incompatibilities with v1. To see the full list of differences between
|
|
v1 and v2, please read the Changes-v2.md file (https://github.com/lestrrat-go/jwx/blob/develop/v2/Changes-v2.md)
|
|
|
|
v2.1.4 Feb 25 2025
|
|
* Update code to work with go1.24
|
|
* Update tests to work with recent latchset/jose
|
|
* Fix build pipeline to work with latest golangci-lint
|
|
|
|
v2.1.3 24 Nov 2024
|
|
* [jwe] Test has been fixed to work under 32-bit systems.
|
|
|
|
v2.1.2 25 Oct 2024
|
|
* [jwt] `jwt.ParseRequest` now uses %w to embed errors returned from
|
|
`jwt.ParseHeader`, `jwt.ParseCookie`, and `jwt.ParseForm`, allowing
|
|
users to correctly call `errors.Is(err, jwt.ErrTokenExpired)` and the
|
|
like. Previously the error returned from `jwt.ParseRequest` showed
|
|
in human readable format what the problem was, but it was not programmatically
|
|
possible to determine the error type using `errors.Is` (#1175)
|
|
|
|
v2.1.1 Jul 28 2024
|
|
* Update minimum required go version to go 1.20
|
|
* Update tests to work on 32-bit systems.
|
|
* [jwa] Add RSA_OAEP_384 and RSA_OAEP_512
|
|
* [jwa] `jwa.SignatureAlgorithm` now has a `IsSymmetric` method.
|
|
* [jwa] Add `jwa.RegisterSignatureAlgorithmOptions()` to register new algorithms while
|
|
specifying extra options. Currently only `jwa.WithSymmetricAlgorithm()` is supported.
|
|
* [jws] Clearly mark `jws.WithHeaders()` as deprecated
|
|
|
|
v2.1.0 18 Jun 2024
|
|
[New Features]
|
|
* [jwt] Added `jwt.ParseCookie()` function
|
|
* [jwt] `jwt.ParseRequest()` can now accept a new option, jwt.WithCookieKey() to
|
|
specify a cookie name to extract the token from.
|
|
* [jwt] `jwt.ParseRequest()` and `jwt.ParseCookie()` can accept the `jwt.WithCookie()` option,
|
|
which will, upon successful token parsing, make the functions assign the *http.Cookie
|
|
used to parse the token. This allows users to further inspect the cookie where the
|
|
token came from, should the need arise.
|
|
* [jwt] (BREAKING CHANGE) `jwt.ParseRequest()` no longer automatically looks for "Authorization" header when
|
|
only `jwt.WithFormKey()` is used. This behavior is the same for `jwt.WithCookieKey()` and
|
|
any similar options that may be implemented in the future.
|
|
|
|
# previously
|
|
jwt.ParseRequest(req) // looks under Authorization
|
|
jwt.ParseRequest(req, jwt.WithFormKey("foo")) // looks under foo AND Authorization
|
|
jwt.ParseRequest(req, jwt.WithHeaderKey("Authorization"), jwt.WithFormKey("foo")) // looks under foo AND Authorization
|
|
|
|
# since this release
|
|
jwt.ParseRequest(req) // same as before
|
|
jwt.ParseRequest(req, jwt.WithFormKey("foo")) // looks under foo
|
|
jwt.ParseRequest(req, jwt.WithHeaderKey("Authorization"), jwt.WithFormKey("foo")) // looks under foo AND Authorization
|
|
|
|
* [jwt] Add `jwt.WithResetValidators()` option to `jwt.Validate()`. This option
|
|
will allow you to tell `jwt.Validate()` to NOT automatically check the
|
|
default validators (`iat`, `exp`, and `nbf`), so that you can completely customize
|
|
the validation with the validators you specify using `jwt.WithValidator()`.
|
|
|
|
This sort of behavior is useful for special cases such as
|
|
https://openid.net/specs/openid-connect-rpinitiated-1_0.html. However, you SHOULD NOT
|
|
use this option unless you know exactly what you are doing, as this will pose
|
|
significant security issues when used incorrectly.
|
|
|
|
* [jwk] Provide a _stop-gap_ measure to work with PEM format ASN.1 DER encoded secp256k1 keys.
|
|
|
|
In order to enable this feature, you must compile jwx with TWO build tags:
|
|
`jwx_es256k` to enable ES256K/secp256k1, and `jwx_secp256k1_pem` to enable PEM handling.
|
|
Not one, but BOTH tags need to be present.
|
|
|
|
With this change, by supplying the `WithPEM(true)` option, `jwk.Parse()` is now
|
|
able to read sep256k1 keys. Also, `jwk.Pem()` should be able to handle `jwk.Key` objects
|
|
that represent a secp256k1 key.
|
|
|
|
Please do note that the implementation of this feature is dodgy at best. Currently
|
|
Go's crypto/x509 does not allow handling additional EC curves, and thus in order to
|
|
accommodate secp256k1 keys in PEM/ASN.1 DER format we need to "patch" the stdlib.
|
|
We do this by copy-and-pasting relevant parts of go 1.22.2's crypto/x509 code and
|
|
adding the minimum required code to make secp256k1 keys work.
|
|
|
|
Because of the above, there are several important caveats for this feature:
|
|
|
|
1. This feature is provided solely as a stop-gap measure until such time Go's stdlib
|
|
provides a way to handle non-standard EC curves, or another external module
|
|
is able to solve this issue.
|
|
|
|
2. This feature should be considered unstable and not guaranteed by semantic versioning
|
|
backward compatibility. At any given point we may drop or modify this feature. It may be
|
|
because we can no longer maintain the code, or perhaps a security issue is found in the
|
|
version of the code that we ship with, etc.
|
|
|
|
3. Please always remember that we are now bundling a static set of code for handling
|
|
x509 formats. You are taking a possible security risk by code that could be outdated.
|
|
Please always do your own research, and if possible, please notify us if the bundled
|
|
code needs to be updated. Unless you know what you are doing, it is not recommended
|
|
that you enable this feature.
|
|
|
|
4. Please note that because we imported the code from go 1.22's src/crypto/x509,
|
|
it has some go1.20-isms in its code. Therefore you will not be able to use the
|
|
`jwx_secp256k1_pem` tag to enable secp256k1 key PEM handling against codebases
|
|
that are built using go 1.19 and below (the build will succeed, but the feature
|
|
will be unavailable).
|
|
|
|
5. We have no plans to include more curves this way. One is already one too many.
|
|
|
|
* [jwe] Fixed a bug when using encryption algorithms involving PBES2 along with the
|
|
jwx.WithUseNumber() global option. Enabling this option would turn all values
|
|
stored in the JSON content to be of type `json.Number`, but we did not account for
|
|
it when checking for the value of `p2c` header, resulting in a conversion error.
|
|
|
|
v2.0.21 07 Mar 2024
|
|
[Security]
|
|
* [jwe] Added `jwe.Settings(jwe.WithMaxDecompressBufferSize(int64))` to specify the
|
|
maximum size of a decompressed JWE payload. The default value is 10MB. If you
|
|
are compressing payloads greater than this and want to decompress it during
|
|
a call to `jwe.Decrypt`, you need to explicitly set a value large enough to
|
|
hold that data.
|
|
|
|
The same option can be passed to `jwe.Decrypt` to control this behavior on
|
|
a per-message basis.
|
|
* [jwe] Added documentation stating that `jwe.WithMaxBufferSize` option will be
|
|
renamed in future versions, i.e. v3
|
|
|
|
v2.0.20 20 Feb 2024
|
|
[New Features]
|
|
* [jwe] Added `jwe.Settings(WithMaxBufferSize(int64))` to set the maximum size of
|
|
internal buffers. The default value is 256MB. Most users do not need to change
|
|
this value.
|
|
* [jws] Allow `jws.WithCompact()` and `jws.WithJSON()` to be passed to `jws.Parse()` and
|
|
`jws.Verify()`. These options control the expected serialization format for the
|
|
JWS message.
|
|
* [jwt] Add `jwt.WithCompactOnly()` to specify that only compact serialization can
|
|
be used for `jwt.Parse()`. Previously, by virtue of `jws.Parse()` allowing either
|
|
JSON or Compact serialization format, `jwt.Parse()` also allowed JSON serialization
|
|
where as RFC7519 explicitly states that only compact serialization should be
|
|
used. For backward compatibility the default behavior is not changed, but you
|
|
can set this global option for jwt: `jwt.Settings(jwt.WithCompactOnly(true))`
|
|
|
|
[Miscellaneous]
|
|
* Internal key conversions should now allow private keys to be used in place of
|
|
public keys. This would allow you to pass private keys where public keys are
|
|
expected.
|
|
|
|
v2.0.19 09 Jan 2024
|
|
[New Features]
|
|
* [jws] Added jws.IsVerificationError to check if the error returned by `jws.Verify`
|
|
was caused by actual verification step or something else, for example, while fetching
|
|
a key from datasource
|
|
|
|
[Security Fixes]
|
|
* [jws] JWS messages formated in full JSON format (i.e. not the compact format, which
|
|
consists of three base64 strings concatenated with a '.') with missing "protected"
|
|
headers could cause a panic, thereby introducing a possibility of a DoS.
|
|
|
|
This has been fixed so that the `jws.Parse` function succeeds in parsing a JWS message
|
|
lacking a protected header. Calling `jws.Verify` on this same JWS message will result
|
|
in a failed verification attempt. Note that this behavior will differ slightly when
|
|
parsing JWS messages in compact form, which result in an error.
|
|
|
|
v2.0.18 03 Dec 2023
|
|
[Security Fixes]
|
|
* [jwe] A large number in p2c parameter for PBKDF2 based encryptions could cause a DoS attack,
|
|
similar to https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-36083. All users who use JWE via this
|
|
package should upgrade. While the JOSE spec allows for encryption using JWE on JWTs, users of
|
|
the `jwt` package are not immediately susceptible unless they explicitly try to decrypt
|
|
JWTs -- by default the `jwt` package verifies signatures, but does not decrypt messages.
|
|
[GHSA-7f9x-gw85-8grf]
|
|
|
|
v2.0.17 20 Nov 2023
|
|
[Bug Fixes]
|
|
* [jws] Previously, `jws.UnregisterSigner` did not remove the previous signer instance when
|
|
the signer was registered and unregistered multiple times (#1016). This has been fixed.
|
|
|
|
[New Features]
|
|
* [jwe] (EXPERIMENTAL) `jwe.WithCEK` has been added to extract the content encryption key (CEK) from the Decrypt operation.
|
|
* [jwe] (EXPERIMENTAL) `jwe.EncryptStatic` has been added to encrypt content using a static CEK.
|
|
Using static CEKs has serious security implications, and you should not use
|
|
this unless you completely understand the risks involved.
|
|
|
|
v2.0.16 31 Oct 2023
|
|
[Security]
|
|
* [jws] ECDSA signature verification requires us to check if the signature
|
|
is of the desired length of bytes, but this check that used to exist before
|
|
had been removed in #65, resulting in certain malformed signatures to pass
|
|
verification.
|
|
|
|
One of the ways this could happen if R is a 31 byte integer and S is 32 byte integer,
|
|
both containing the correct signature values, but R is not zero-padded.
|
|
|
|
Correct = R: [ 0 , ... ] (32 bytes) S: [ ... ] (32 bytes)
|
|
Wrong = R: [ ... ] (31 bytes) S: [ ... ] (32 bytes)
|
|
|
|
In order for this check to pass, you would still need to have all 63 bytes
|
|
populated with the correct signature. The only modification a bad actor
|
|
may be able to do is to add one more byte at the end, in which case the
|
|
first 32 bytes (including what would have been S's first byte) is used for R,
|
|
and S would contain the rest. But this will only result in the verification to
|
|
fail. Therefore this in itself should not pose any security risk, albeit
|
|
allowing some illegally formated messages to be verified.
|
|
|
|
* [jwk] `jwk.Key` objects now have a `Validate()` method to validate the data
|
|
stored in the keys. However, this still does not necessarily mean that the key's
|
|
are valid for use in cryptographic operations. If `Validate()` is successful,
|
|
it only means that the keys are in the right _format_, including the presence
|
|
of required fields and that certain fields have proper length, etc.
|
|
|
|
[New Features]
|
|
* [jws] Added `jws.WithValidateKey()` to force calling `key.Validate()` before
|
|
signing or verification.
|
|
|
|
* [jws] `jws.Sign()` now returns a special type of error that can hold the
|
|
individual errors from the signers. The stringification is still the same
|
|
as before to preserve backwards compatibility.
|
|
|
|
* [jwk] Added `jwk.IsKeyValidationError` that checks if an error is an error
|
|
from `key.Validate()`.
|
|
|
|
[Bug Fixes]
|
|
* [jwt] `jwt.ParseInsecure()` was running verification if you provided a key
|
|
via `jwt.WithKey()` or `jwt.WithKeySet()` (#1007)
|
|
|
|
v2.0.15 19 20 Oct 2023
|
|
[Bug fixes]
|
|
* [jws] jws.Sign() now properly check for valid algorithm / key type pair when
|
|
the key implements crypto.Signer. This was caused by the fact that when
|
|
jws.WithKey() accepted keys that implemented crypto.Signer, there really
|
|
is no way to robustly check what algorithm the crypto.Signer implements.
|
|
|
|
The code has now been modified to check for KNOWN key types, i.e. those
|
|
that are defined in Go standard library, and those that are defined in
|
|
this library. For example, now calling jws.Sign() with jws.WithKey(jwa.RS256, ecdsaKey)
|
|
where ecdsaKey is either an instance of *ecdsa.PrivateKey or jwk.ECDSAPrivateKey
|
|
will produce an error.
|
|
|
|
However, if you use a separate library that wraps some KMS library which implements
|
|
crypto.Signer, this same check will not be performed due to the fact that
|
|
it is an unknown library to us. And there's no way to query a crypto.Signer
|
|
for its algorithm family.
|
|
|
|
v2.0.14 17 Oct 2023
|
|
[New Features]
|
|
* [jwk] jwk.IsPrivateKey(), as well as jwk.AsymmetricKey has been added.
|
|
The function can be used to tell if a jwk.Key is a private key of an
|
|
asymmetric key pair.
|
|
[Security]
|
|
* golang.org/x/crypto has been updated to 0.14.0. The update contains a fix for HTTP/2
|
|
rapid reset DoS vulnerability, which some security scanning software may flag.
|
|
However, do note that this library is NOT affected by the issue, as it does not have
|
|
the capability to serve as an HTTP/2 server. This is included in this release
|
|
document so that users will be able to tell why this library may be flagged
|
|
when/if their scanning software do so.
|
|
|
|
v2.0.13 26 Sep 2023
|
|
[New Features]
|
|
* [jwk] jwk.Equal has been added. Please note that this is equivalent to
|
|
comparing the keys' thumbprints, therefore it does NOT take in consideration
|
|
non-essential fields.
|
|
|
|
[Miscellaneous]
|
|
* Various documentation fixes and additions.
|
|
|
|
v2.0.12 - 11 Aug 2023
|
|
[Bug fixes]
|
|
* [jwt] jwt.Serializer was ignoring JWE flags (#951)
|
|
|
|
[Miscellaneous]
|
|
* [jwk] Check for seed length on OKP JWKs to avoid panics (#947)
|
|
* [jws] Documentation for jws.WithKeySet()
|
|
|
|
v2.0.11 - 14 Jun 2023
|
|
[Security]
|
|
* Potential Padding Oracle Attack Vulnerability and Timing Attack Vulnerability
|
|
for JWE AES-CBC encrypted payloads affecting all v2 releases up to v2.0.10,
|
|
all v1 releases up to v1.2.25, and all v0 releases up to v0.9.2 have been reported by
|
|
@shogo82148.
|
|
|
|
Please note that v0 versions will NOT receive fixes.
|
|
This release fixes these vulnerabilities for the v2 series.
|
|
|
|
v2.0.10 - 12 Jun 2023
|
|
[New Features]
|
|
* [jwe] (EXPERIMENTAL) Added `jwe.KeyEncrypter` and `jwe.KeyDecrypter` interfaces
|
|
that works in similar ways as how `crypto.Signer` works for signature
|
|
generation and verification. It can act as the interface for your encryption/decryption
|
|
keys that are for example stored in an hardware device.
|
|
|
|
This feature is labeled experimental because the API for the above interfaces have not
|
|
been battle tested, and may need to changed yet. Please be aware that until the API
|
|
is deemed stable, you may have to adapt your code to these possible changes,
|
|
_even_ during minor version upgrades of this library.
|
|
|
|
[Bug fixes]
|
|
* Registering JWS signers/verifiers did not work since v2.0.0, because the
|
|
way we handle algorithm names changed in 2aa98ce6884187180a7145b73da78c859dd46c84.
|
|
(We previously thought that this would be checked by the example code, but it
|
|
apparently failed to flag us properly)
|
|
|
|
The logic behind managing the internal database has been fixed, and
|
|
`jws.RegisterSigner` and `jws.RegisterVerifier` now properly hooks into the new
|
|
`jwa.RegisterSignatureAlgorithm` to automatically register new algorithm names
|
|
(#910, #911)
|
|
[Miscellaneous]
|
|
* Added limited support for github.com/segmentio/asm/base64. Compile your code
|
|
with the `jwx_asmbase64` build tag. This feature is EXPERIMENTAL.
|
|
|
|
Through limited testing, the use of a faster base64 library provide 1~5% increase
|
|
in throughput on average. It might make more difference if the input/output is large.
|
|
If you care about this performance improvement, you should probably enable
|
|
`goccy` JSON parser as well, by specifying `jwx_goccy,jwx_asmbase64` in your build call.
|
|
* Slightly changed the way global variables underneath `jwk.Fetch` are initialized and
|
|
configured. `jwk.Fetch` creates an object that spawns workers to fetch JWKS when it's
|
|
first called.
|
|
You can now also use `jwk.SetGlobalFetcher()` to set a fetcher object which you can
|
|
control.
|
|
|
|
v2.0.9 - 21 Mar 2023
|
|
[Security Fixes]
|
|
* Updated use of golang.org/x/crypto to v0.7.0
|
|
[Bug fixes]
|
|
* Emitted PEM file for EC private key types used the wrong PEM armor (#875)
|
|
[Miscellaneous]
|
|
* Banners for generated files have been modified to allow tools to pick them up (#867)
|
|
* Remove unused variables around ReadFileOption (#866)
|
|
* Fix test failures
|
|
* Support bazel out of the box
|
|
* Now you can create JWS messages using `{"alg":"none"}`, by calling `jws.Sign()`
|
|
with `jws.WithInsecureNoSignature()` option. (#888, #890).
|
|
|
|
Note that there is no way to call
|
|
`jws.Verify()` while allowing `{"alg":"none"}` as you wouldn't be _verifying_
|
|
the message if we allowed the "none" algorithm. `jws.Parse()` will parse such
|
|
messages without verification.
|
|
|
|
`jwt` also allows you to sign using alg="none", but there's no symmetrical
|
|
way to verify such messages.
|
|
|
|
v2.0.8 - 25 Nov 2022
|
|
[Security Fixes]
|
|
* [jws][jwe] Starting from go 1.19, code related to elliptic algorithms
|
|
panics (instead of returning an error) when certain methods
|
|
such as `ScalarMult` are called using points that are not on the
|
|
elliptic curve being used.
|
|
|
|
Using inputs that cause this condition, and you accept unverified JWK
|
|
from the outside it may be possible for a third-party to cause panics
|
|
in your program.
|
|
|
|
This has been fixed by verifying that the point being used is actually
|
|
on the curve before such computations (#840)
|
|
[Miscellaneous]
|
|
* `jwx.GuessFormat` now returns `jwx.InvalidFormat` when the heuristics
|
|
is sure that the buffer format is invalid.
|
|
|
|
v2.0.7 - 15 Nov 2022
|
|
[New features]
|
|
* [jwt] Each `jwt.Token` now has an `Options()` method
|
|
* [jwt] `jwt.Settings(jwt.WithFlattenedAudience(true))` has a slightly
|
|
different semantic than before. Instead of changing a global variable,
|
|
it now specifies that the default value of each per-token option for
|
|
`jwt.FlattenAudience` is true.
|
|
|
|
Therefore, this is what happens:
|
|
|
|
// No global settings
|
|
tok := jwt.New()
|
|
tok.Options.IsEnabled(jwt.FlattenAudience) // false
|
|
|
|
// With global settings
|
|
jwt.Settings(jwt.WithFlattenedAudience(true))
|
|
tok := jwt.New()
|
|
tok.Options.IsEnabled(jwt.FlattenAudience) // true
|
|
// But you can still turn FlattenAudience off for this
|
|
// token alone
|
|
tok.Options.Disable(jwt.FlattenAudience)
|
|
|
|
Note that while unlikely to happen for users relying on the old behavior,
|
|
this change DOES introduce timing issues: whereas old versions switched the
|
|
JSON marshaling for ALL tokens immediately after calling `jwt.Settings`,
|
|
the new behavior does NOT affect tokens that have been created before the
|
|
call to `jwt.Settings` (but marshaled afterwards).
|
|
|
|
So the following may happen:
|
|
|
|
// < v2.0.7
|
|
tok := jwt.New()
|
|
jwt.Settings(jwt.WithFlattenedAudience(true))
|
|
json.Marshal(tok) // flatten = on
|
|
|
|
// >= v2.0.7
|
|
tok := jwt.New() // flatten = off
|
|
jwt.Settings(jwt.WithFlattenedAudience(true))
|
|
json.Marshal(tok) // flatten is still off
|
|
|
|
It is recommended that you only set the global setting once at the
|
|
very beginning of your program to avoid problems.
|
|
|
|
Also note that `Clone()` copies the settings as well.
|
|
|
|
[Miscellaneous]
|
|
* WithCompact's stringification should have been that of the
|
|
internal identity struct ("WithSerialization"), but it was
|
|
wrongly producing "WithCompact". This has been fixed.
|
|
* Go Workspaces have been enabled within this module.
|
|
- When developing, modules will refer to the main jwx module that they
|
|
are part of. This allows us to explicitly specify the dependency version
|
|
in, for example, ./cmd/jwx/go.mod but still develop against the local version.
|
|
- If you are using `goimports` and other tools, you might want to upgrade
|
|
binaries -- for example, when using vim-go's auto-format-on-save feature,
|
|
my old binaries took well over 5~10 seconds to compute the import paths.
|
|
This was fixed when I switched to using go1.19, and upgraded the binaries
|
|
used by vim-go
|
|
|
|
v2.0.6 - 25 Aug 2022
|
|
[Bug fixes][Security]
|
|
* [jwe] Agreement Party UInfo and VInfo (apv/apu) were not properly being
|
|
passed to the functions to compute the aad when encrypting using ECDH-ES
|
|
family of algorithms. Therefore, when using apu/apv, messages encrypted
|
|
via this module would have failed to be properly decrypted.
|
|
|
|
Please note that bogus encrypted messages would not have succeed being
|
|
decrypted (i.e. this problem does not allow spoofed messages to be decrypted).
|
|
Therefore this would not have caused unwanted data to to creep in --
|
|
however it did pose problems for data to be sent and decrypted from this module
|
|
when using ECDH-ES with apu/apv.
|
|
|
|
While not extensively tested, we believe this regression was introduced
|
|
with the v2 release.
|
|
|
|
v2.0.5 - 11 Aug 2022
|
|
[Bug fixes]
|
|
* [jwt] Remove stray debug log
|
|
* [jwk] Fix x5u field name, caused by a typo
|
|
* [misc] Update golangci-lint action to v3; v2 was causing weird problems
|
|
|
|
v2.0.4 - 19 Jul 2022
|
|
[Bug Fixes]
|
|
* [jwk] github.com/lestrrat-go/httprc, which jwk.Cache depends on,
|
|
had a problem with inserting URLs to be refetched into its queue.
|
|
As a result it could have been the case that some JWKS were not
|
|
updated properly. Please upgrade if you use jwk.Cache.
|
|
|
|
* [jwk] cert.Get could fail with an out of bounds index look up
|
|
|
|
* [jwk] Fix doc buglet in `KeyType()` method
|
|
|
|
[New Features]
|
|
* [jws] Add `jws.WithMultipleKeysPerKeyID()` suboption to allow non-unique
|
|
key IDs in a given JWK set. By default we assume that a key ID is unique
|
|
within a key set, but enabling this option allows you to handle JWK sets
|
|
that contain multiple keys that contain the same key ID.
|
|
|
|
* [jwt] Before v2.0.1, sub-second accuracy for time based fields
|
|
(i.e. `iat`, `exp`, `nbf`) were not respected. Because of this the code
|
|
to evaluate this code had always truncated any sub-second portion
|
|
of these fields, and therefore no sub-second comparisons worked.
|
|
A new option for validation `jwt.WithTruncation()` has been added
|
|
to workaround this. This option controls the value used to truncate
|
|
the time fields. When set to 0, sub-second comparison would be
|
|
possible.
|
|
FIY, truncation will still happen because we do not want to
|
|
use the monotonic clocks when making comparisons. It's just that
|
|
truncating using `0` as its argument effectively only strips out
|
|
the monotonic clock
|
|
|
|
v2.0.3 - 13 Jun 2022
|
|
[Bug Fixes]
|
|
* [jwk] Update dependency on github.com/lestrrat-go/httprc to v1.0.2 to
|
|
avoid unintended blocking in the update goroutine for jwk.Cache
|
|
|
|
v2.0.2 - 23 May 2022
|
|
[Bug Fixes][Security]
|
|
* [jwe] An old bug from at least 7 years ago existed in handling AES-CBC unpadding,
|
|
where the unpad operation might remove more bytes than necessary (#744)
|
|
This affects all jwx code that is available before v2.0.2 and v1.2.25.
|
|
|
|
[New Features]
|
|
* [jwt] RFC3339 timestamps are also accepted for Numeric Date types in JWT tokens.
|
|
This allows users to parse servers that erroneously use RFC3339 timestamps in
|
|
some pre-defined fields. You can change this behavior by setting
|
|
`jwt.WithNumericDateParsePedantic` to `false`
|
|
* [jwt] `jwt.WithNumericDateParsePedantic` has been added. This is a global
|
|
option that is set using `jwt.Settings`
|
|
|
|
v2.0.1 - 06 May 2022
|
|
* [jwk] `jwk.Set` had erroneously been documented as not returning an error
|
|
when the same key already exists in the set. This is a behavior change
|
|
since v2, and it was missing in the docs (#730)
|
|
* [jwt] `jwt.ErrMissingRequiredClaim` has been deprecated. Please use
|
|
`jwt.ErrRequiredClaim` instead.
|
|
* [jwt] `jwt.WithNumericDateParsePrecision` and `jwt.WithNumericDateFormatPrecision`
|
|
have been added to parse and format fractional seconds. These options can be
|
|
passed to `jwt.Settings`.
|
|
The default precision is set to 0, and fractional portions are not parsed nor
|
|
formatted. The precision may be set up to 9.
|
|
* `golang.org/x/crypto` has been upgraded (#724)
|
|
* `io/ioutil` has been removed from the source code.
|
|
|
|
v2.0.0 - 24 Apr 2022
|
|
* This i the first v2 release, which represents a set of design changes
|
|
that were learnt over the previous 2 years. As a result the v2 API
|
|
should be much more consistent and uniform across packages, and
|
|
should be much more flexible to accomodate real-world needs.
|
|
|
|
For a complete list of changes, please see the Changes-v2.md file,
|
|
or check the diff at https://github.com/lestrrat-go/jwx/compare/v1...v2
|
|
|
|
[Miscellaneous]
|
|
* Minor house cleaning on code generation tools
|
|
|
|
[jwt]
|
|
* `jwt.ErrMissingRequiredClaim()` has been added
|
|
|
|
v2.0.0-beta2 - 16 Apr 2022
|
|
[jwk]
|
|
* Updated `jwk.Set` API and reflected pending changes from v1 which were
|
|
left over. Please see Changes-v2.md file for details.
|
|
|
|
* Added `jwk.CachedSet`, a shim over `jwk.Cache` that allows you to
|
|
have to write wrappers around `jwk.Cache` that retrieves a particular
|
|
`jwk.Set` out of it. You can use it to, for example, pass `jwk.CachedSet`
|
|
to a `jws.Verify`
|
|
|
|
cache := jwk.NewCache(ctx)
|
|
cache.Register(ctx, jwksURL)
|
|
cachedSet := jwk.NewCachedSet(cache, jwksURL)
|
|
jws.Verify(signed, jws.WithKeySet(cachedSet))
|
|
|
|
v2.0.0-beta1 - 09 Apr 2022
|
|
[Miscellaneous]
|
|
* Renamed Changes.v2 to Changes-v2.md
|
|
* Housecleaning for lint action.
|
|
* While v2 was not affected, ported over equivalent test for #681 to catch
|
|
regressions in the future.
|
|
* Please note that there is no stability guarantees on pre-releases.
|
|
|
|
v2.0.0-alpha1 - 04 Apr 2022
|
|
* Initial pre-release of v2 line. Please note that there is no stability guarantees
|
|
on pre-releases.
|