863c9db9a1649cd8bb6fc42eb19c0edcf9216030
Feature/code optimization
* Ran Black
* made a small change in code_last_check, fixed so it returns string and not single char
* Made changes to make sure that default_ind postprocess only happens to the cc output and not dashboard
* Merge bugfix/default_ind_postprocess into feature/code_optimization
- Parent-child: child_rank column init and cols_to_keep filter
- Postprocess: default_ind only on cc output
- code_last_check: parser str/list return handling + exception logging
- Prompt: FIELD ASSIGNMENT for code extraction (no CRITICAL prefix)
* More prompt changes and debugging print statements
* Added system to group same service term + bill type cd + claim type cd and then parallelize the code extraction (will improve consistency)
* Revert one-time PROV_INFO_JSON ad hoc logic; retain json_utils and output format
- Remove temporary postprocess step that filled empty TIN in PROV_INFO_JSON from
FILENAME_TIN (fill_prov_info_tin_from_filename_tin call in postprocess.py).
This behavior is intended to move upstream per JIRA (tin_npi_funcs / extraction).
- Revert postprocess_existing_output.py to generic config: empty INPUT_DIR,
INPUT_FILENAME, OUTPUT_CSV. Remove one-time hyphen-strip for TIN/NPI in
PROV_INFO_JSON and remove _strip_hyphens_from_prov_info_json_cell.
- Keep json_utils PROV_INFO_JSON helpers (parse_prov_info_json_cell,
serialize_prov_info_json, format_prov_info_json) and (str,str) serialization
in contract_config_postprocess. Keep fill_prov_info_tin_from_filename_tin and
related helpers in postprocessing_funcs for potential upstream reuse.
- Tests in test_json_parsers.py updated for (str,str) PROV_INFO_JSON output.
* Add arbitration-based implicit code flow and prefer Level 2 RAG (Fix 5d, 4c+7)
Implicit flow no longer uses first-match-wins. We build a case from all
applicable strategies and run a single arbitration step to choose the
best candidate.
- build_implicit_candidates: Run Category (when explicit had Category),
Special, and RAG; return list of {source, code_answer_dict}. RAG
result uses preferred level when both return (Fix 5d).
- code_implicit_rag (Fix 5d): Run both Level 1 and Level 2, collect
results; when both return non-empty, prefer Level 2 over Level 1.
- code_implicit_arbitration: 0 candidates -> None; 1 candidate -> return
it with CODE_METHODOLOGY = 'Implicit - Arbitration (Source)' (no LLM);
2+ candidates -> one CODE_IMPLICIT_ARBITRATION LLM call (chosen_index or
no_match). If no candidates or no_match, code_last_check runs as before.
- prompt_templates: Add CODE_IMPLICIT_ARBITRATION and
CODE_IMPLICIT_ARBITRATION_INSTRUCTION (cached). Use
_create_json_dict_parser(field_names=['chose…
* fix: test_code_breakout avoid LLM call and flaky order on CI
- Add BILL_TYPE_CD_DESC to test data so pre-pass skips fill_bill_type (no Bedrock on CI)
- Use side_effect function keyed by SERVICE_TERM for deterministic result under ThreadPoolExecutor
* ran black
* feat: hybrid code validation with unmatched tagging and code quality fixes
Validation and unmatched tagging:
- Add format-only filtering for explicit codes (drop wrong-format, preserve valid)
- Add unified _has_unmatched_codes() used by both explicit and implicit paths
- Tag CODE_METHODOLOGY with "- Unmatched" when codes are format-valid but
not explicit keys in our mappings (codes and range keys count as mapped)
- Remove retry logic and "Explicit - Validation Failed" in favor of single
LLM call with Unmatched tagging
- Include all revenue level mappings in valid revenue set
Code quality and bug fixes:
- Fix fill_bill_type += string bug (was splitting "11X" into chars)
- Fix bare except clauses in code_explicit, code_category,
code_implicit_special, fill_bill_type (now except Exception as e)
- Replace eval() with json.loads() in fill_grouper_cd_desc
- Implement INVALID_SERVICE short-circuit in RAG (Fix 5a)
- Cache valid procedure/revenue code sets per Constants instance
- Store mappings in level_dicts…
* chore: remove debug print statements from code extraction pipeline
Remove all [DEBUG_CODE_EXTRACTION] print statements added during
development of the hybrid validation and implicit arbitration flow.
* refactor: robust PROV_INFO_JSON sanitization with multi-format parsing
Replace the simple format_prov_info_json with a layered
sanitize_prov_info_json that handles all known malformed variants:
single-quoted dicts, empty-value-after-colon patterns, list-typed
field values, and hyphenated TINs. Extract _normalize_prov_entries
and _prov_value_to_str helpers for uniform str-valued output.
format_prov_info_json now delegates to sanitize_prov_info_json.
* merge: sync feature/code_optimization with DEV
Resolve conflict in prompt_templates.py: keep detailed CRITICAL field
assignment instructions from feature branch; accept new
AARETE_DERIVED_PROVIDER_NAME prompt function from DEV.
* Minor change to explict prompt
* fix: resolve mypy errors and remove stale pipe-delim splits in RAG
- Narrow grouper_cd type to str|None with explicit None check to
satisfy mypy in fill_grouper_cd_desc.
- Remove dead pipe-delim split logic from CPT and HCPCS matching
blocks (no pipes in those mappings).
- Retain pipe split for revenue block only (rev_level1.csv keys are
pipe-delimited, e.g. "0810|0811|0812").
* Code extraction: format-only explicit, keep unmapped tag, RAG Level 1/2 as separate candidates
- Explicit: accept all format-valid codes (single + range); do not drop for mapping.
Validity check only appends "- Unmatched" to methodology when code not in mappings.
- Add _procedure_code_or_range_format_valid; use in validate_explicit_codes and _has_unmatched_codes.
- RAG: return list of Level 1 and Level 2 candidates (distinct source keys); remove Level 2 preference.
- build_implicit_candidates: consume RAG list and append each as separate candidate.
- CODE_EXPLICIT: clarify range extraction when service term describes a range.
- CODE_IMPLICIT_ARBITRATION: choose most appropriate candidate(s), avoid overly broad.
- Tests updated for new RAG return shape and validate_explicit_codes behavior.
* Resolved Merge Conflicts
* Fixed failing tests
* Remove unused functions
* Remove unused functions
* Revert "Remove unused functions"
This reverts commit 39954db6a421e55501282d4e6a270c88624049fe.
* remove unused
* Merged DEV into feature/code_optimization
* Merged DEV into feature/code_optimization
Approved-by: Katon Minhas
Field Extraction Pipeline
Contract field extraction using LLMs.
Setup
Install uv (if not already installed)
# Ubuntu/WSL (recommended)
curl -LsSf https://astral.sh/uv/install.sh | sh
source ~/.bashrc # or restart terminal
# macOS
curl -LsSf https://astral.sh/uv/install.sh | sh
# Windows (PowerShell - native, not WSL)
powershell -ExecutionPolicy ByPass -c "irm https://astral.sh/uv/install.ps1 | iex"
Verify installation: uv --version
Install dependencies
uv sync
Running the Code
Use uv run with Python's module flag from the project root:
# Run the default SaaS pipeline
uv run python -m src.pipelines.saas.main
# Run with unified runner (supports client selection)
uv run python -m src.pipelines.runner --client saas --input-dir /path/to/input
# Run with specific client
uv run python -m src.pipelines.runner --client clover --input-dir /path/to/input
Note: Always use uv run to ensure correct virtual environment. Always use -m flag for proper imports.
Development
Before pushing, always run these checks to avoid breaking the CI pipeline:
# Format code
uv run black src/
# Type checking
uv run mypy src/
# Run tests
uv run pytest
All checks must pass before merging to main.
Project Structure
├── src/
│ ├── pipelines/ # Pipeline implementations
│ │ ├── runner.py # Unified CLI entry point with client routing
│ │ ├── saas/ # Default SaaS pipeline
│ │ │ └── main.py # Main entry point for SaaS
│ │ ├── shared/ # Shared pipeline components
│ │ │ ├── preprocessing/ # Document preprocessing
│ │ │ ├── extraction/ # Field extraction logic
│ │ │ └── postprocessing/ # Result postprocessing
│ │ └── clients/ # Client-specific overrides
│ │ └── clover/ # Clover client customizations
│ ├── core/ # Core utilities (registry, fieldset)
│ ├── constants/ # Constants, mappings, and field definitions
│ │ ├── mappings/ # Crosswalk JSON files
│ │ └── lists/ # Lookup lists
│ ├── prompts/ # LLM prompt templates
│ ├── utils/ # Shared utilities (IO, string, logging, etc.)
│ ├── codes/ # Medical code extraction utilities
│ ├── crosswalk/ # Crosswalk mapping logic
│ ├── embeddings/ # Pre-computed embeddings for code matching
│ ├── qc_qa/ # QC/QA validation pipeline
│ ├── parent_child/ # Parent-child relationship mapping
│ ├── document_classification/ # Document type classification (DTC)
│ └── tests/ # Unit tests
├── documentation/ # Project documentation
├── outputs/ # Pipeline output files (gitignored)
├── logs/ # Log files (gitignored)
└── pyproject.toml # Project dependencies (uv/pip)
Branching
Naming Conventions
| Type | Pattern | Use Case | Example |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feature | feature/<ticket>-<description> |
New functionality | feature/PROJ-123-add-export-csv |
| Bugfix | bugfix/<ticket>-<description> |
Bug fixes | bugfix/PROJ-456-fix-null-handling |
| Hotfix | hotfix/<ticket>-<description> |
Urgent production fixes | hotfix/PROJ-789-critical-parse-error |
| Test | test/<description> |
Testing/experimentation | test/lesser-table-caching-refactor |
| Release | release/<version> |
Release preparation | release/v1.2.0 |
Branch Guidelines
- Use lowercase with hyphens (kebab-case) for descriptions
- Include ticket number when applicable (e.g., JIRA, GitHub issue)
- Keep branch names concise but descriptive
- Delete branches after merging
Workflow
- Create branch from
main - Make changes and commit with clear messages
- Run checks before pushing:
uv run black src/ && uv run mypy src/ && uv run pytest - Create PR to
main - Ensure all CI checks pass
- Get code review approval
- Squash and merge
Description
Languages
Python
80.5%
Jupyter Notebook
13%
HCL
3.1%
HTML
1.6%
PLpgSQL
1.5%
Other
0.2%